ANALYSIS OF CONTROL ARCHITECTURES FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52326/jes.utm.2026.33(2).02Keywords:
UAV, autonomous drone, control system, On-Board Control, Drone Swarm, Ground Control System, real-time control, autonomous navigation, operational autonomy, multi-agent systems, distributed controlAbstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become important components of modern systems for monitoring, inspection, mapping, and autonomous intervention. Their performance directly depends on the efficiency of the control systems and the architecture used for data processing, decision-making, and mission coordination. The paper presents a comparative analysis of the main control architectures used in UAV platforms: control with on-board processing (On-Board Control), hierarchical Master-Swarm architecture, and centralized systems based on a Ground Control System (GCS). It describes the operating principles of each architecture, the hardware and software components involved, advantages, limitations, and specific areas of application. The analysis highlights the impact of each solution on autonomy, scalability, resilience to communication loss, and real-time control performance. The results obtained show that On-Board Control systems offer superior autonomy and robustness, Master-Swarm architectures are intended particularly for the collaborative coordination of drone swarms, and GCS systems provide advanced capabilities for monitoring and centralized processing. Furthermore, current trends oriented towards hybrid architectures are highlighted, which combine the advantages of the three models to increase the level of autonomy, safety, and operational efficiency of modern UAV systems.
References
Lizzio, F.F.; Capello, E.; Guglieri, G. (2022). ‘A Review of Consensus-Based Multi-Agent UAV Implementations’, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 106, Article 43. DOI: 10.1007/s10846-022-01743-9
Alenezi, M.; et al. (2024). ‘Advancement Challenges in UAV Swarm Formation Control: A Comprehensive Review’, Drones, 8(7), Article 320. DOI: 10.3390/drones8070320
Cetinsaya, B.; Reiners, D.; Cruz-Neira, C. (2024). ‘From PID to Swarms: A Decade of Advancements in Drone Control and Path Planning – A Systematic Review (2013–2023)’, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 89, Article 101626. DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2024.101626
Abbas, N.; Abbas, Z.; Zafar, S.; et al. (2024). ‘Survey of Advanced Nonlinear Control Strategies for UAVs: Integration of Sensors and Hybrid Techniques’, Sensors, 24(11), Article 3286. DOI: 10.3390/s24113286
Wang, G.; Gu, C.; Li, J.; et al. (2023). ‘Heterogeneous Flight Management System (FMS) Design for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Current Stages, Challenges, and Opportunities’, Drones, 7(6), Article 380. DOI: 10.3390/drones7060380
Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; et al. (2024). ‘Cooperative Motion Planning and Control for Aerial-Ground Autonomous Systems: Methods and Applications’, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 146, Article 101005. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.101005
Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; et al. (2022). ‘Algorithms and Applications of Intelligent Swarm Cooperative Control: A Comprehensive Survey’, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 135, Article 100869. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100869
Javaid, S.; Saeed, N.; Qadir, Z.; et al. (2023). ‘Communication and Control in Collaborative UAVs: Recent Advances and Future Trends’, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24, 5719–5739. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2023.3248841
Bertizzolo, L.; D’Oro, S.; Ferranti, L.; et al. (2020). ‘SwarmControl: An Automated Distributed Control Framework for Self-Optimizing Drone Networks’, arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2005.09781. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.09781
Khan, M.A.; Kumar, N.; Mohsan, S.A.H.; et al. (2022). ‘Swarm of UAVs for Network Management in 6G: A Technical Review’, arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2210.03234. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2210.03234.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
